The concept of a perfect inspection, often perceived as one with no findings, may actually be a missed opportunity for elevating safety standards. This view challenges the traditional management philosophy, which suggests that workers’ maximum effort often equates to meeting the minimum standard set by their superiors. In the context of safety, if merely complying with OSHA standards is the goal, it suggests a relatively low bar for safety performance.
Drawing parallels from the world of quality auditing, valuable lessons can be applied to safety auditing. A notable example is Dr. W. Edwards Deming, a renowned figure in quality management, who introduced the “Goal Post Analogy” in his books. This analogy can be effectively translated to safety: the “process” refers to people, behaviors, and actions, while the “product” encompasses personal protective equipment (PPE), tools, machinery maintenance, operations, and equipment usage.
Consider a football field with goal posts so wide and low that scoring becomes trivial. Naturally, to maintain challenge and standards, the goal posts would need to be narrowed. This analogy applies aptly to safety inspections. Here, the OSHA standards represent the initial goal posts. If inspections consistently reveal few or no deficiencies, referred to as “non-conformances,” it’s an indication to tighten the standards, perhaps to include company policies.
Furthering this approach, if inspections still show minimal non-conformances with OSHA Standards or company policies, the focus should shift to “industry best practices,” significantly narrowing the tolerance for both process and product.
It’s important to recognize that these terms and standards are not fixed and can be adapted as needed. The ultimate aim is to set such high safety standards that it becomes nearly impossible to have a “perfect” inspection in the traditional sense.
This philosophy is well understood by safety professionals who continuously strive to elevate safety standards for their clients. An interesting observation in this rigorous process is noting minor non-conformances, such as a dirty truck cab. While seemingly trivial, such findings are indicative of a high level of safety compliance, warranting both commendation and a reminder for cleanliness.
In summary, redefining what constitutes a ‘perfect’ inspection can lead to a more robust and proactive approach to workplace safety, ensuring continuous improvement and higher standards.
Breaking the Cycle of Revolving Door Safety Teams
You’re in the middle of your busiest season, desperately trying to keep up with deadlines, and out of the blue, your only safety person submits their notice. Now you’re left without safety personnel, putting your workforce at risk, and potentially falling out of compliance or breaching contractual obligations. What’s your next move? Do you appoint…
Continue Reading Breaking the Cycle of Revolving Door Safety Teams
Why Does Your Company Need a Safety Team?
The construction industry is undeniably a risky one. Even for simple construction jobs, the risks posed to employees are numerous and continuously evolving. Though some companies may be hesitant to invest in a dedicated safety team, having one provides numerous benefits pertaining to employee health, hazard reduction and company culture enrichment. So let us ask…
A Culture of Safety or a Culture of Fear?
It was a day like any other. Steve, the Site Safety Manager for a mid-size construction firm, clocked in bright and early, greeted his colleagues, and reviewed the plans for the day. His supervisor was visiting the site, but otherwise, everything seemed routine. As expected, there were no issues onsite. Another day of safety success. …
