The concept of a perfect inspection, often perceived as one with no findings, may actually be a missed opportunity for elevating safety standards. This view challenges the traditional management philosophy, which suggests that workers’ maximum effort often equates to meeting the minimum standard set by their superiors. In the context of safety, if merely complying with OSHA standards is the goal, it suggests a relatively low bar for safety performance.
Drawing parallels from the world of quality auditing, valuable lessons can be applied to safety auditing. A notable example is Dr. W. Edwards Deming, a renowned figure in quality management, who introduced the “Goal Post Analogy” in his books. This analogy can be effectively translated to safety: the “process” refers to people, behaviors, and actions, while the “product” encompasses personal protective equipment (PPE), tools, machinery maintenance, operations, and equipment usage.
Consider a football field with goal posts so wide and low that scoring becomes trivial. Naturally, to maintain challenge and standards, the goal posts would need to be narrowed. This analogy applies aptly to safety inspections. Here, the OSHA standards represent the initial goal posts. If inspections consistently reveal few or no deficiencies, referred to as “non-conformances,” it’s an indication to tighten the standards, perhaps to include company policies.
Furthering this approach, if inspections still show minimal non-conformances with OSHA Standards or company policies, the focus should shift to “industry best practices,” significantly narrowing the tolerance for both process and product.
It’s important to recognize that these terms and standards are not fixed and can be adapted as needed. The ultimate aim is to set such high safety standards that it becomes nearly impossible to have a “perfect” inspection in the traditional sense.
This philosophy is well understood by safety professionals who continuously strive to elevate safety standards for their clients. An interesting observation in this rigorous process is noting minor non-conformances, such as a dirty truck cab. While seemingly trivial, such findings are indicative of a high level of safety compliance, warranting both commendation and a reminder for cleanliness.
In summary, redefining what constitutes a ‘perfect’ inspection can lead to a more robust and proactive approach to workplace safety, ensuring continuous improvement and higher standards.
How Much Safety Training Do Your Employees Really Need?
“We really don’t need much safety training.” It’s something we occasionally hear from employers. Truth be told, they may be right. Not every employee needs every safety class and not every company needs the same training program. Putting employees through training that has nothing to do with the hazards they actually face isn’t a good…
Continue Reading How Much Safety Training Do Your Employees Really Need?
Safety That Scales: Growth Without the Overhead
Companies face an interesting challenge when business begins to change. When your backlog grows, you need additional resources. When projects become more complex, you may need specialized expertise. When you expand into a new region, your existing team may suddenly be stretched across more jobsites. When you are awarded a federal contract, you may need…
Continue Reading Safety That Scales: Growth Without the Overhead
You’re OSHA Compliant. But Are You Contract Compliant?
Your company has a strong safety program and your employees are trained. Your supervisors understand OSHA requirements and you have someone responsible for safety in the field. So you’re ready for a federal construction project, right? Maybe. There’s another question worth asking: Are you prepared to meet the safety requirements of the contract itself? For…
Continue Reading You’re OSHA Compliant. But Are You Contract Compliant?
