The concept of a perfect inspection, often perceived as one with no findings, may actually be a missed opportunity for elevating safety standards. This view challenges the traditional management philosophy, which suggests that workers’ maximum effort often equates to meeting the minimum standard set by their superiors. In the context of safety, if merely complying with OSHA standards is the goal, it suggests a relatively low bar for safety performance.
Drawing parallels from the world of quality auditing, valuable lessons can be applied to safety auditing. A notable example is Dr. W. Edwards Deming, a renowned figure in quality management, who introduced the “Goal Post Analogy” in his books. This analogy can be effectively translated to safety: the “process” refers to people, behaviors, and actions, while the “product” encompasses personal protective equipment (PPE), tools, machinery maintenance, operations, and equipment usage.
Consider a football field with goal posts so wide and low that scoring becomes trivial. Naturally, to maintain challenge and standards, the goal posts would need to be narrowed. This analogy applies aptly to safety inspections. Here, the OSHA standards represent the initial goal posts. If inspections consistently reveal few or no deficiencies, referred to as “non-conformances,” it’s an indication to tighten the standards, perhaps to include company policies.
Furthering this approach, if inspections still show minimal non-conformances with OSHA Standards or company policies, the focus should shift to “industry best practices,” significantly narrowing the tolerance for both process and product.
It’s important to recognize that these terms and standards are not fixed and can be adapted as needed. The ultimate aim is to set such high safety standards that it becomes nearly impossible to have a “perfect” inspection in the traditional sense.
This philosophy is well understood by safety professionals who continuously strive to elevate safety standards for their clients. An interesting observation in this rigorous process is noting minor non-conformances, such as a dirty truck cab. While seemingly trivial, such findings are indicative of a high level of safety compliance, warranting both commendation and a reminder for cleanliness.
In summary, redefining what constitutes a ‘perfect’ inspection can lead to a more robust and proactive approach to workplace safety, ensuring continuous improvement and higher standards.
You’re OSHA Compliant. But Are You Contract Compliant?
Your company has a strong safety program and your employees are trained. Your supervisors understand OSHA requirements and you have someone responsible for safety in the field. So you’re ready for a federal construction project, right? Maybe. There’s another question worth asking: Are you prepared to meet the safety requirements of the contract itself? For…
Continue Reading You’re OSHA Compliant. But Are You Contract Compliant?
Beyond the Safety Classroom: How Gamification and VR Can Build Better Decision-Makers
For decades, safety training has followed a familiar formula: put employees in a classroom, present the information, show a video, give them a quiz, and document that the training was completed. It may get the job done, but how much do trainees actually retain? Research suggests not much. Jennifer Lastra of 360 Immersive says, “Disengagement…
A Day in the Life of a Safety Professional
When most people hear the words safety professional, they probably picture someone walking around a jobsite with a hard hat, clipboard, and checklist. We won’t lie, there is some of that. But the reality is much more dynamic.
