The concept of a perfect inspection, often perceived as one with no findings, may actually be a missed opportunity for elevating safety standards. This view challenges the traditional management philosophy, which suggests that workers’ maximum effort often equates to meeting the minimum standard set by their superiors. In the context of safety, if merely complying with OSHA standards is the goal, it suggests a relatively low bar for safety performance.
Drawing parallels from the world of quality auditing, valuable lessons can be applied to safety auditing. A notable example is Dr. W. Edwards Deming, a renowned figure in quality management, who introduced the “Goal Post Analogy” in his books. This analogy can be effectively translated to safety: the “process” refers to people, behaviors, and actions, while the “product” encompasses personal protective equipment (PPE), tools, machinery maintenance, operations, and equipment usage.
Consider a football field with goal posts so wide and low that scoring becomes trivial. Naturally, to maintain challenge and standards, the goal posts would need to be narrowed. This analogy applies aptly to safety inspections. Here, the OSHA standards represent the initial goal posts. If inspections consistently reveal few or no deficiencies, referred to as “non-conformances,” it’s an indication to tighten the standards, perhaps to include company policies.
Furthering this approach, if inspections still show minimal non-conformances with OSHA Standards or company policies, the focus should shift to “industry best practices,” significantly narrowing the tolerance for both process and product.
It’s important to recognize that these terms and standards are not fixed and can be adapted as needed. The ultimate aim is to set such high safety standards that it becomes nearly impossible to have a “perfect” inspection in the traditional sense.
This philosophy is well understood by safety professionals who continuously strive to elevate safety standards for their clients. An interesting observation in this rigorous process is noting minor non-conformances, such as a dirty truck cab. While seemingly trivial, such findings are indicative of a high level of safety compliance, warranting both commendation and a reminder for cleanliness.
In summary, redefining what constitutes a ‘perfect’ inspection can lead to a more robust and proactive approach to workplace safety, ensuring continuous improvement and higher standards.
Eight Questions to Ask Before Hiring a Safety Training Provider
When it comes to workplace safety training, most organizations focus on cost, scheduling, or meeting compliance requirements. While those factors are important, they shouldn’t be the only considerations. Not all safety training providers are equal. The quality of the instructor, the experience behind the training, and the credibility of the company delivering it can significantly…
Continue Reading Eight Questions to Ask Before Hiring a Safety Training Provider
Digging Without Danger – Best Practices for Safe Digging Month
Spring is the season when projects take off – construction crews mobilize, homeowners head outdoors, and long-awaited plans finally move forward. Whether you’re managing a large excavation project or simply planting a tree in your backyard, one critical step should always come first: planning for what lies beneath the surface. April is Safe Digging Month.…
Continue Reading Digging Without Danger – Best Practices for Safe Digging Month
Eye Safety During Low Vision Awareness Month
Of the five senses, sight is perhaps the one we rely on most. From the time we open our eyes in the morning until we sleep at night, we are flooded with millions of images that help us navigate and understand the world around us. February is Low Vision Awareness Month. Millions of people live…
Continue Reading Eye Safety During Low Vision Awareness Month
