The concept of a perfect inspection, often perceived as one with no findings, may actually be a missed opportunity for elevating safety standards. This view challenges the traditional management philosophy, which suggests that workers’ maximum effort often equates to meeting the minimum standard set by their superiors. In the context of safety, if merely complying with OSHA standards is the goal, it suggests a relatively low bar for safety performance.
Drawing parallels from the world of quality auditing, valuable lessons can be applied to safety auditing. A notable example is Dr. W. Edwards Deming, a renowned figure in quality management, who introduced the “Goal Post Analogy” in his books. This analogy can be effectively translated to safety: the “process” refers to people, behaviors, and actions, while the “product” encompasses personal protective equipment (PPE), tools, machinery maintenance, operations, and equipment usage.
Consider a football field with goal posts so wide and low that scoring becomes trivial. Naturally, to maintain challenge and standards, the goal posts would need to be narrowed. This analogy applies aptly to safety inspections. Here, the OSHA standards represent the initial goal posts. If inspections consistently reveal few or no deficiencies, referred to as “non-conformances,” it’s an indication to tighten the standards, perhaps to include company policies.
Furthering this approach, if inspections still show minimal non-conformances with OSHA Standards or company policies, the focus should shift to “industry best practices,” significantly narrowing the tolerance for both process and product.
It’s important to recognize that these terms and standards are not fixed and can be adapted as needed. The ultimate aim is to set such high safety standards that it becomes nearly impossible to have a “perfect” inspection in the traditional sense.
This philosophy is well understood by safety professionals who continuously strive to elevate safety standards for their clients. An interesting observation in this rigorous process is noting minor non-conformances, such as a dirty truck cab. While seemingly trivial, such findings are indicative of a high level of safety compliance, warranting both commendation and a reminder for cleanliness.
In summary, redefining what constitutes a ‘perfect’ inspection can lead to a more robust and proactive approach to workplace safety, ensuring continuous improvement and higher standards.
Securing Workplaces Through Target Hardening: A Guide
Workplace violence has become an unfortunate reality for many businesses. A quick search brings up many articles on recent recent workplace gun violence incidents; a grim reminder that no workplace is completely safe. These events can be hard to predict, but businesses have tools to proactively reduce risks. One of the most effective tools is…
Continue Reading Securing Workplaces Through Target Hardening: A Guide
What a New Administration Could Mean for Workplace Safety
With a new administration about to take office in Washington D.C., businesses are watching closely to see how workplace safety regulations might shift. Changes in administration often bring updates to OSHA standards, labor laws, and compliance requirements. Whether you’re in manufacturing, construction, or managing a remote team, staying ahead of these changes is key to…
Continue Reading What a New Administration Could Mean for Workplace Safety
Cybersecurity Awareness and Training: Building a Human-Centric Defense
Cybersecurity awareness training has never been more important. While advanced technologies like AI and quantum cryptography have reshaped the landscape, human error continues to be a major vulnerability. That’s why investing in cybersecurity awareness and training has been a top priority for many organizations this year. The Human Element: Why Humans Are Cybersecurity’s Weakest Link…
Continue Reading Cybersecurity Awareness and Training: Building a Human-Centric Defense
